October 13, 2006

transit of mercury

A rare astronomical event is coming your way on November 8th: the transit of Mercury. Observers will see a small black disk “transiting” the face of the Sun as the planet Mercury comes between Earth and Sol in such a way for it to be visible here in North America. Happily, my Son’s telescope and I will be at his school for some hands-on education during the transit. Nothing edifies an old Curmudgeon like spending an afternoon with a class of seven year olds.

Unfortunately, I will be in need of edification on this day after our national apostasy.

Apostasy will be exactly the right word in the eyes of Republicans as they witness American voters turning away from the true faith of conservatism. “Revival” will probably seem more fitting if you are a Democrat.

You see, one jihadist’s sanctification is another’s abomination in American political theology.

But the apostasy to which I refer is the anti-democratic election process we engage in under the guise of republican democracy. Vote for anyone you want, damn near everyone tells me, so long as they are a Republican or Democrat. Republicans seem uncannily certain that Democrats are going to Hell and Democrats share the same heartfelt moral contempt for the GOP. Both would agree on the fate of those that disparage the two-party system: there is a special level of Hell just for us.

I shall not, however, be dissuaded from regaling you with my disenfranchised observations while I await my fate in the hereafter. And given that we are getting down to election time, I will hazard a few prognostications and some prospective aftermath analysis.

I am not in rare company when I predict the GOP’s ouster from power on November 7th. Depending on who you choose to listen to, 350 to 390 seats in the House of Representative are considered “safe”. Decades of rapacious Gerrymandering have reduced things to where as few as twenty seats out of 435 are considered serious contests. But the current margin of GOP House control is so thin that the balance of power may still swing on those twenty or so Congressional districts.

As luck would have it for the Democrats this time around, the Democratic seats up this election tend to be the safer seats and the Republican seats less so. A six seat shift will be required for control of the Senate to go blue and something like ten of the thirty-three seats are considered seriously contested. My sense is the national rage against the war in Iraq is going to deliver the Senate chamber keys to party of Jefferson though by a narrower margin than in the House.

Analyzing congressional elections through the lens of national issues has historically lacked utility, but Tip O’Neil’s admonition that all politics is local seems quaint to me now. Certainly there are still times and specific races where local factors are more important than national ones, but in recent years there have been more Congressional elections that were national in character than not. In the wake of 9-11 and the Iraq Occupation, national issues are at the forefront as seldom before.

It was the national focus that brought out the Moral Majority in record numbers two years ago to thwart the putative leftist attack on families. In spite of this incredible energy generated in the right-wing base last election, the result was an even thinner margin of control in Congress as war weariness was already beginning to set in. This election, there is no lightening-rod issue at the forefront to energize the right, but for the left it will be the body count. It doesn’t take an astrophysicist to grasp the polling data. The GOP base has cooled off and the Democrats sense their opportunity.

And I’m talking now about 2008.

You see, this election is 1966 all over again. In 1966 mid-term elections, the GOP made big gains in Congress in what was an easily recognizable harbinger of the 1968 GOP Presidential campaign success. Wars that lose their purpose inevitably have bigger effects than jokes about “Mission Accomplished” banners. While it would be a mistake to push the 1966 to 2006 analogy too far, the same voter nerves have been rubbed raw and the result will be a changing of the guard.

The good news is that I can look forward to enjoying two years of return to glorious dead-lock. You remember what that was like do you not? Stalemate with the Executive and Legislative branches in the hands of different parties was a (relatively) beautiful thing. It was more beautiful than I even realized back then. Extremist agendas, be they from the left or right, while often noisy, in retrospect they did not get nearly as much traction.

The bad news is that the 1966 election was followed by 1968 just as surely as 2006 will be followed by 2008. As was the case back then, the body bags will continue to accumulate and voters will be looking for change.

Leave it to Shurb to screw up the opportunity for a golden age of glorious stalemate: the GOP has botched things so severely that we are about to find the government entirely in the hands of the Democrats in two years.

Even this I would calculate to be good news for me personally: cynical punditry should be at its zenith. Surely I’ll soon be picked up by a national syndicator because opportunities like his only happen once in a life time. If you think the Arkansas mafia was fun the first time, just wait till they apply the lessons learned at the knee of Rove and company. Can you imagine the excitement in their camp? Now their elitist ways are legal thanks to the GOP.

Whether we like it or not, we should start practicing our salutations now because “Madame President” does not yet flow readily from the tongue.

Yes indeed, I’m looking forward to November 8th and my time with the seven and eight-year olds. Thanks to the kids, I will have less time to contemplate the rigor-mortis that will then be setting in on those experiencing sudden political death. It will get my mind off of the tragic American political mess and on bigger things. On youngsters who offer hope rather than adults who sold theirs to the highest bidder. On the inevitable triumph of Good.

Perhaps it is no accident that Mercury is making his show on the heels of the day of death and apostasy. One of Mercury’s lesser celebrated services to man was to act as an escort to see the newly dead from Earth to the Underworld. Depending on whether you root for Team Blue team or Team Red, you may have differing opinions on whether the departed Titans should properly be escorted to the Elysian Fields.

Me?

My bet is down on justice: a speedy transit to Tartarus.

108 Comments:

Blogger Tony Plank said...

Olan,

You said, ”[W]hat he SHOULD be doing is prosecuting the war with every tool at our disposal and saying TO HELL with anyone that does not like it.”

From where I sit, that is exactly how the petulant little twerp got us into this mess to begin with. The only reason you have seen a moderation in what the administration is doing is that the “to-hell-with-you” philosophy has failed miserably and the GOP handlers are demanding a new approach to save their own arses from the political meltdown headed their way.

The way cut off the arms supply to the terrorists is by getting our arms around our own strategic energy position. Until we accomplish that then…well let just say an old phrase about the direction of the wind and relieving natural urges comes to mind.

As happy as I am that you agreed with me on this one, I am comforted to know we still have plenty of room for disagreement.

9:18 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

CG defending Hilary. OH! My, my! Next thing you know he’ll be rooting for the Sooners and trading in his Tivo for a Betamax.

9:21 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Paul,

Welcome to posting here on the Disenfranchised Curmudgeon my very old friend. Hope you will hang around and post some. I think it is fun here.

Speaking of libertarianism, I wrote a piece some time ago that might interest you called why i am no longer a libertarian. I have been down that road and I too can be candid about my troubled past.

On Federalism, I am somewhat more amenable to it than some but in reality the concept of Federalism is as dead as the fourth amendment. And I really do not think turning back the clock is possible at this point. Legally we have set the precedent and given power to Washington without serious deliberation. As sad as it may be, the deed is done. Shred your copy of the Magna Charta too while you are at it. The King lives.

9:39 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

CG,

I’ve been talking about getting the money out of elections since back when your world revolved around Miller Lite.

The Two Parties is all about the money.

But what a great analogy that I totally missed. Just like the Mideast can only be fixed by taking away their source of funding, so too the American political system can only be fixed by taking money away from the Demopublican terrorists.

How do you do that you might ask? Only one way: quit voting for them.

If you give a flying crap about the issues you claim to care about then you need to man up and vote for the Green party.

As much as I enjoy my rants about the system, I really do not have that much sympathy for people that vote for these people and then complain about how broken it is. If you want to guarantee that there will be no significant change, vote Demopublican.

10:02 AM  
Blogger Flame Thrower said...

I wish Kinky were running for Federal office instead of the Texas Statehouse.

3:43 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

FT,

Kinky is a loon. That is the problem that the 3rd parties have right now. Credible candidates are desperately needed. Even dumbed down Americans can see that Kinky, Perot and Ventura are loons.

I will say this: if Kinky Friendman is half as good at being governor as he is at making salsa, then he would be a great choice.

5:20 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Actually, I would want to have the doman www.dontvotewithoutyourbrainengaged.edu.

5:21 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Commies!

1:49 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Look here everybody!

CG is wagging his finger about how stupid Shrub is! This from the blogizen that think Madame President will solve all our problems.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe CG is now qualified to be a CongressCritter.

2:10 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

CG,

Another irony I like: the Democrats who supported the war that are now of a different mind when the polling data shifted. Which time exactly were they being principaled?

Just wondering.

7:20 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

CG

One billion people overweight, 300 million obese worldwide

How about a gluttony tax? We have a luxury tax on yachts, cars, and gas guzzlers. How about a gluttony tax? And subsidies for oat meal and MiniWheats and high bean content food items? All of this would be for the “common good”, except the freeways would be clogged with people who didn’t die of clogged arteries from Twinkie overload. Must have cost benefit analysis done.

BTW, 2 Congressmen on the same page comment trumped my "page meat" comment. Be ashamed. :)

P.R.

9:43 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

I wish I could believe that. People are just not getting it...I'm sure there are a passionate handful, but I sense no real outrage.

9:41 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

CG is too busy printing Hillary 2006 signs to respond I'm sure.

10:38 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

"For those of you keeping score at home, John Kerry has now called members of the U.S. military a) stupid, b) crazy, c) murderers, d) rapists, e) terrorizers of Iraqi women and children. I wonder what he'll call them tomorrow. Whatever Karl Rove is paying John Kerry to say stupid things, it's worth every penny." Ann Coulter

The troops message to John Kerry.

11:06 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

"Of course Americans should vote Democrat," Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group, and infamous leader of the 2002 siege of Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, told WND.

"This is why American Muslims will support the Democrats, because there is an atmosphere in America that encourages those who want to withdraw from Iraq. It is time that the American people support those who want to take them out of this Iraqi mud," said Jaara, speaking to WND from exile in Ireland, where he was sent as part of an internationally brokered deal that ended the church siege.

Jaara and others told WND that they believe if the Democrats come into power because of the party's position on withdrawing from Iraq, that ensures victory for the worldwide Islamic resistance.
-WND article.

10:42 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Just to restate the official position of the Disenfranchised Curmudgeon.

Any vote for national office in favor of a Democrat or Republican is immoral.

If you care about America, don't waste your vote on these blood suckers. Vote independent or third party.

9:56 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Given that politicians are self serving reprobates,
Given that those who aren’t, by the nature of governing other men, will become self serving reprobates.
Given that past independents and third parties have also been self serving reprobates, usually existing somewhere between Democrats and Republicans,
and Given that the Disenfranchised Curmudgeon has yet to offer any, much less a roster, of potential candidates for this or any other election...

I hereby call on all able bodied citizens to endeavor to persevere in electing the lesser of two self serving blood sucking reprobate politicians of your choice, by immorally casting your vote this Tuesday. ;-)

3:50 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

... the entire GOP appears to be gay.

Then they are a protected group off limits to criticism....funny thing for a party that preaches a traditional definition of marriage...and a particular waste of a tall slim blonde.

5:29 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof calling for unrepentant immorality. Never thought I'd see the day.

So Prof, you we are close enough to Louisianna that you should have an opinion. Who was the lesser evil: Duke or Edwards?

And I have to flat disagree. I have volunteered to be President many times. Nobody seems to take me seriously though. I think if it truly were a lesser evil kind of thing, I'd be a shoe-in.

10:25 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

So Prof, you we are close enough to Louisiana that you should have an opinion. Who was the lesser evil: Duke or Edwards?

Not all races are like that. Given a despicable rascal that is for abortion and a despicable rascal that is against abortion, I prefer the latter. Ditto border security, save the snail darter, or whatever floats your boat. Not all elections show a clear better choice. Many do. Because those controlling the parties are on the take and the propensity for scoundrels to congregate on the ballot, does not make burying one’s head in the sand an equivalent responsible option for the concerned citizenry.

You can make an equivalent statement on the two party system by burning a donkey and an elephant caricature on election day. But to do something constructive rather than just make a statement, find out which politician, were he to do what he said he would, would cause the greatest harm, then vote fore his opponent. It’s the electoral equivalent of jumping on a grenade….painful and unpleasant, but benefit’s the “common good©.”

Finally, God held Israel responsible for its leaders, even those unelected blokes called kings. How much more does he hold our nation responsible when we have the power to elect whom ever we please?

11:04 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

We can't even elect competence... good government is totally out of reach.... i.e. a pipe dream.

I am glad you agree and have decided that because we can’t elect competence that it would be absurd to turn our health care system over to such a band of knuckleheads. Bravo! I applaud your decision. :)

6:55 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

CG,
Try ZoneAlarm free version. Does not seem to slow anything down on my pc.

Go to this web page to check for holes in your firewall.

You can get a free antivirus software here too.

Obviously free has no bells and whistles. But it didn’t seem to lobotomize my pc like Norton and McAfee did.

11:45 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof,

Hopefully you aren't accusing me of putting my head in the sand. If you are, let me know and I'll respond. :-D

If you are going to choose the one who is the lesser evil, then surely you have to vote independent or third party. If the lesser evil works for you (it does not for me) then I'd think you should be pulling the Libertarian lever absent personal knowledge of the individual.

Libertarians have a lot more chance of implementing a free market agenda than do the Republicans. The GOP talks about it, but they drink from the mother's milk of special interests. A vote for the GOP is a vote that is calculated to CONDEM the market proponents agenda to failure.

Now just copy and paste that paragraph, substitute CG for Prof, Green for Libertarian, Dem for GOP and socialist for market propenents, and you get the idea.

There is still time for you to save yourselves. I urge you to cast a vote consistent with your own moral codes. Don't risk lying awake at nights: eschew the Demopublicans and Republocrats! Make a stand!

2:28 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Tony,

If you are going to choose the one who is the lesser evil, then surely you have to vote independent or third party.

So far I have voted Libertarian and the Constitutional party. I haven’t found a so called "independent" that didn’t sway towards socialism.

If the lesser evil works for you (it does not for me) then I'd think you should be pulling the Libertarian lever absent personal knowledge of the individual.

I think the Constitutional party is basically the libertarian less the pro-abortion, anything goes socially stance.

Libertarians have a lot more chance of implementing a free market agenda than do the Republicans. The GOP talks about it, but they drink from the mother's milk of special interests.

I agree. However, remember, RINO’s can go both ways. Republicans In Name Only are not just liberals, but Libertarians as well. Ron Paul being the most readily recognizable example. Libertarians wanting to actually be taken seriously and have a chance at getting elected, and thus achieving their agenda can masquerade as Republicans. Unfortunately this taints the Libertarian with the filth of the GOP two facedness, but enough of these creatures might influence the party, particularly if they are willing to criticize fellow Repubs for excess spending, gov’t expansion, etc..

A vote for the GOP is a vote that is calculated to CONDEM the market proponents agenda to failure.

But a vote for an individual within the GOP need not. Don’t pull the party lever. Learn the individuals position and if the free marketers are in the Democrat party then vote for them. Actually, the thought of infiltrating either party with rational free marketers is intriguing. Particularly since they, in general, are too big of wussies to stick to a constitutional form of government. Long live wolves in sheepish GOP clothing!!!

3:58 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

“Now more than ever the people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless, and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness, and corruption. If it be intelligent, brave, and pure, it is because the people demand these high qualities to represent them in the national legislature. . . . [I]f the next centennial does not find us a great nation . . . it will be because those who represent the enterprise, the culture, and the morality of the nation do not aid in controlling the political forces.”
[James Garfield, "A Century of Congress" published in Atlantic, July 1877]


“On Two Ministers of State: Lump says that Caliban's of gutter breed, And Caliban says Lump's a fool indeed, And Caliban and Lump and I are all agreed.” - Hilaire Belloc

4:07 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof,

You said, ” Don’t pull the party lever. Learn the individuals position and if the free marketers are in the Democrat party then vote for them.”

That sounds good. If it makes you sleep better at night to think that, then good for you.

But the reality is that special interest money controls the two major parties. It is rare they get elected unless they take PAC money, and if they do, they don’t get re-elected unless they do. It sounds good to say you want to take a look at the individuals. In an abstract way, I certainly agree with that.

I don’t have a present count, but a book I’ve just read documented the number of CongressCritters that do not take PAC money. I think the number as of a few years ago was 7. That’s right, 7 out of 535 do not take the PAC buy-offs. And what did the 7 have in common?

Guesses? Guesses? If you said they were independently wealthy, you go to the head of the class. They are probably your clients Prof, so I’m guessing you know who they are.

In my view, the ones with their heads in the sand are the el stupidos that vote for a Democrat or Republican because they represent “change”. That would be funny if not for being so incredibly sad.

I detailed out the corruption of the Democrats to CG in private emails a while back. Anybody who thinks voting Democratic is going to clean things up is running a risk of being a victim of the war on drugs: Put down the crack pipes people and step away from the Diebolds. The Democrats brought us some of the better scandals in recent memory.

Excuse me folks, I have to go wretch…

5:50 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

It happened rather simply this AM. I got out my Free Market Foundation Voter’s Guide - it doesn’t tell you how to vote, just what positions they claim to hold - I compared the positions of Dems, Repubs, Ind., & Libertarians, marked my choices and took the guide with me into the booth. Only chose one of the Libertarians. He was a Pro-Baby killer, but so were his opponents. Knowing that the Repub. & Dem. were both socialist in American clothing, I voted for the free marketer that was pro-gun, anti-excess gov’t.

Knowing that none of the candidates running in this election or any other agrees with me 100%, and knowing therefore that I must elect some with at least some deviation from my principled positions, I voted for the least deviation from my positions, if only to prevent those with the greatest of deviations from my position from gaining office. I know the Libertarian vote I made will not bring the fruit of his gaining office, but the two parties will know that someone was not with them.

There were a couple of write-in votes available, but I was not aware of them and never researched their positions. If they are not organized enough to get on the ballot, then maybe that is evidence enough not to take them seriously. On second thought, such a procrastinating candidate maybe just the answer to reactionary socialism and its effect on government growth. Procrastinating politicians unite....late on the night of the deadline!

2:42 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Oh yeah, Prof - Where's your political theory of every thing website on how biblical is the basis for all of our laws?

1 - I started the website and had a draft of the intro and outline and a boatload of links.
2 - I entered a new “school” year and I am more involved in the nuts and bolts of instruction with my children - ie, too busy.
3 - I realized the sizeable task of accumulating all that I had with quotes and links and decided that the magnum opus would be just that.
4 - I also realized that regardless of what I did and how many hours I devoted to it - it wouldn’t matter to you.

Since you are a counselor, you’ve heard of William Blackstone. His definitive work was what our forefathers studied to be counselors themselves. Read chapter 2 of volume 1 of his 4 volume set. Several websites have it in both its original spelling and modernized. Its what the founders were trained in and believed when they wrote the Constitution. I retract my offer to spend boat loads of time devoted to the preparation of this document, knowing it would have little effect. Consider this a mark in your win column if you like. The data is there, the historic documents are there, the founders writing is there. I found it without problem. Yes, there were some who did not believe that way, but the movers and shakers did. Our belief systems and worldview will either permit us to see it or it wont. I consider myself open minded because over the course of my life I have been pro & anti abortion, and pro & anti evolution. However, I am as biased as the next guy.

8:02 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Be afraid.

Be very afraid.

My prognostications are coming true and I have predicted Hillary as the next Prez.

Be very, very afraid.

I'm planning a trip to hold CG's trembling hand as he casts that Hillary vote.

9:33 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

The good news is the poltical ads stop.
The bad news is the baby killer socialists won over the baby saver slightly less socialists.

Don’t have a crystal ball, but I’ll give you some guesses.

1 - Glorious gridlock occurs when the house, senate, and executive branch are “owned” by opposing factions. Hopefully nothing will get done.

2 - Generally the economy does better under Democrat control, but usually the executive branch and only for a year or two. The economy is already singing along with low unemployment, construction everywhere, and taxes streaming into government at never before seen rates. Government knows what to do with increased tax revenue - expand. But remember, it never contracts.

3 - Various Bush tax cuts will sunset at different stages. Some this year, some in ‘08 and some in 2010. After the tax cuts were implemented, the top 10% paid a greater share of the tax burden. If we remove those tax cuts what do you think that will do to the proportion of tax burden? I gave stats from the IRS to back this up in earlier posts. Also note that under the Bush tax cuts, like under JFK’s cuts, tax revenues increase once we came out of the recession, also aided by the tax cuts. This revenue increase after a tax cut shows we were on the downside of the Laffer Curve. If the tax cuts that increased tax revenue are taken away and we are sent further down the Laffer Curve, what happens to tax revenue? When the cuts sunset, will more money be available for “universal healthcare” and other help-the-disadvantaged programs? When the cuts sunset, will the need to shelter income through legal and illegal means be greater or lesser? You all are big boys and can muse, lend me your wisdom.

I’ve been watching cable stations lately on houses being repaired, appraised, & flipped. There are all kinds. One thing I noticed is that if you are in California you have to be stinking rich to be broke. Three bedroom houses that would go for $90,000 here in TX ($75k in OK), run about $500-$800K in CA. How do they do that? Do people flipping burgers make $100k per year? Dude, I’d have to win the lottery to rent an apartment there. I think its HGTV, check it out. I bring this up for a reason. Estate tax will sunset and go back to $1 million exemption. Here in TX if you have $1 million plus, you usually have a family farm, a self employed business owner, or you’ve got some good investments, not boatloads, but you wont be sweating the Social Security check each month. In California if your house is paid for, you’re toast. Sell it baby. Somebody has got to liquidate that puppy when the 46+% estate tax rates hit because you’re rich enough over the course of your life to have paid off a typical 3 bedroom home with a thimble size back yard. Though the Demosocialists won’t identify with dollar figures what the “wealthy” and “rich” buggie-man that is the root of all evil in their worldview, it is apparent that if you own any land (private property buggie-man) or you happened not to spend yourself in to debt hell, but actually saved some money (“the filthy rich”), or you own a going concern that you’ve built up over the years (capitalist pigs), you are the target of death taxes. The socialist point of view is that the greatest and most rightful heir to property is the “State”. The Demosocialists will fight to consume the remnants of property purchased with after-tax dollars of Americans. The diety of State must be paid homage to. And what better sacrifice that the fruit of the bourgeoisie?

9:51 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Common,

re: minimum wage increases

Why is there a limit? Why only go from $5.25 to $7 or $8? Why not $9, $10, $12, $20, $50/hour? What economic law applies after $5.25, but not before? What fairness issues come into play after $8-10/hour that do not apply before?

9:57 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Meet the new speaker
Pelosi served as leader of socialist-leaning Progressive Caucus

Article here.

As severe as my previous socialist rant was, it pales in comparison to the truth. Read the short article.

10:21 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

All marriage amendments and gay union bans were trumped yesterday and few noticed. It was not even on a ballot, but we lost major. Did you notice?

12:49 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

So Prof,

We are trading a pack of neo-fascists for a pack of neo-socialists and that is a bad thing?

Here is the really good news. The system is set up to where nothing important will get implemented. Unless you count further impairments of human rights protections, of course.

2:29 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

CG,

You got your Hillary 2008 yard signs back from the printers yet?

2:30 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

We are trading a pack of neo-fascists for a pack of neo-socialists and that is a bad thing?

Both are fascists.

I don’t mean to imply that all roads lead to the womb... :-) ...but if I am going to have a leader, and the leader is going to be a fascist, then I would rather they not be for slaughtering the unborn. The pro-evolutionary socialist fascist view held by the Democrats is one of unrepentant baby slaughterer supporters.

2:49 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof,

That almost makes sense to me. But then I remember...the GOP had total control for several years here and how much progress did they make on abortion?

But your point is well taken...they both have fascist tendencies. I just think the GOP program of coopting big business through strategic regulation do be more like National Socialism than the Dem agenda.

3:07 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Limbaugh on the state of things:

"Now I'm liberated from having to constantly come in here every day and try to buck up a bunch of people who don't deserve it, to try to carry the water and make excuses for people who don't deserve it. I did not want to sit here and participate, willingly, in the victory of the libs, in the victory of the Democrat Party by sabotaging my own. But now with what has happened yesterday and today, it is an entirely liberating thing. If those in our party who are going to carry the day in the future -- both in Congress and the administration -- are going to choose a different path than what most of us believe, then that's liberating. I don't see this with any animosity about anybody, and I don't mean to make this too personal.
....
But it has been difficult sometimes, when these people on our side have not had the guts to stand up for themselves, have not had the guts to explain what they really believe and why they're doing what they're doing. When they haven't had the courage to be who they are, when they haven't had the courage to be conservatives. It has been a challenge to come in here and look at some of the weaknesses and some of the missed opportunities and try to cover for them and make up for them and make sure that the opportunities are not totally lost. But at some point you have to say, "I'm not them, and I can't assume the responsibility for their success. It isn't my job to make them succeed. It isn't my job to make elected Republicans look good if they can't do it themselves. It's not my job to make them understandable and understood if they can't do it themselves -- not in perpetuity, not ad infinitum." So all I can tell you is I feel a little liberated, and I think this is all going to result in a lot of cleansing in a number of areas."


Unfortunately, Rush will fail to follow his thinking down it ultimate path. He will fail to understand that the parties themselves have become the significant political problem in our country. He is no different than most Americans. He is bought into the whole two party thing as something we must live with.

What we need to do is attack that and rebuild fresh.

3:27 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Don’t know if you heard Scott Wilder today, but he nailed it. The loss on the election is purely at the feet of George Bush.

Once again President Bush is looking forward to working with the Democrats...after all, they won’t hold him to conservative principles and promises. We are 3/4 of the way through Democrat George Bush’s reign. The Democrats have been so stupid with rage because of the “R” after his name that they failed to see he was one of them. Big spender, wants to reward illegal international tresspassers whose first act in America was breaking our laws. He wanted unproven Hariett Meyers, He only mentioned the marriage amendment during elections, he signed the McCain Feingold censor of political speech. He appears to be left of John McCain.

But then I remember...the GOP had total control for several years here...

Government education has created a nation seeking to be nursed by big government. Even the “conservative” party is clueless. I cringed hearing the President today. He sounds down right giddy to work with a new congress that expects more from him what he is really wanting to deliver. The next two years of bipartisan “compromises” I am sure will be painful to him. Yeah right. And it put enough bad taste in the mouth of true conservatives that milk toast John McCain will be our nominee, a sure loss to Hillary.

C.G., save your money on those ‘08 Hillary signs. It’s a sure shoe in without spending the bucks. Your going to need those bucks to buy the illegal timely healthcare that Hillarycare will create the demand for. Enjoy 1 hour waits, it’ll never be that short again. Just ask the folks in the socialist utopias.

5:13 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof,

You said, The next two years of bipartisan “compromises” I am sure will be painful to him. Yeah right. And it put enough bad taste in the mouth of true conservatives that milk toast John McCain will be our nominee, a sure loss to Hillary.

Right on point. These people don't care a tinker's damn about the principals they purport to uphold. CG will be singing this same lament in about...oh, I'll give it five years. It will go like this. In about a year he'll be saying that the Dems could get it done if they only held the White House. Then when they get that, he'll somehow blame the GOP for a while. Then it will eventually all fall apart and they will be exposed for the charlatans they are and he'll moan over the same stuff.

Anybody notice that Nancy Pelosi is married to a stock broker? Heh. Yeah, everything will be COMPLETELY different now.

5:30 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Hahaha MI...that was good.

CG-I'm giving up trying to convince you that there will be no appreciable difference between this regime and the last. You have to follow this stuff hard and heaving for a while before you get it.

I was you once upon a time. I was practically in tears in 1980 because I was twenty-five days to young to cast a vote for Reagan. By that time I had been following politics closely for five years. Like you, I thought the GOP had faults, but at least they supported a core agenda of fiscal conservatism and anti-communism that drove most of my political thinking at the time. At least they wouldn’t roll over on important national security issues like the Panama canal or continue pouring huge amounts of money into failed social experiments.

I slowly grew less enchanted with the GOP as my thought drifted toward a more personal liberty focused view but I still pulled the lever for the GOP because reigning in the budget seemed so important to me.

Then came the Republican revolution. They exposed themselves for the hypocrites they are and things started getting a lot clearer for me. About that time, I read Boorstin’s “The Image” and the pieces started to fit into place. I started carefully looking at what the Democrats said and comparing it to what they did. I learned a bit about campaign finance. I also had some personal life changes that gave me a much greater insight into what was really happening with big business and regulation and thereby learned how the Democrats are just as tightly in bed with big Business as is the GOP. This was a bit of a shock to me but when you bounced what I saw people doing off of things like coffee klatches and white envelopes getting passed around, you figure this stuff out.

You are bright young common do-gooder. I have no doubt you will join me in my disillusionment eventually. Frankly, it is my prayer that you don’t take it as hard as I did. Actually, you are probably one of the few people I know who get how hard swallowing that reality pill was for me. I don’t wish that for you and I’m trying to save you from my bitter fate.

7:40 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

“Prof you are so hard to please.”

A common characteristic of someone who sticks to his principles in a world of compromise. :-)

Finally, I predict:

(1) & (2) Agreed, (3) Possibly, & (4) I hope not.

There will not be gridlock and Bush will finally be freed from being held policitally hostage by the far right.

Finally, Prof - really - Bush a democrat? Is that what's its come to?


Reread your previous statement: ...Bush will finally be freed from being held policitally hostage by the far right. He did a lot of lip service but his heart was not in it. I always voted for somebody else than George until I had to vote against Gore and Kerry. I thought he was a Democrat when he was running the first time....so this is no reaction to recent phenomena.

C.G.: Hillary won't be able to beat Obama in 2008.

You over estimate his delivery of a speech with thinking in his head. Hillary, though objectionable on every front, can run circles around him intellectually. She’s just as fun to listen to as eating soggy bread.

Tony,
Though politically I am with you, there are real differences in degree of socialism implemented. For instance, when I employed my young children in my business years ago, I wanted to pay them a rate commensurate with there worth and the economic lessons to be learned - probably $3.50-$4.00/hr. The minimum wage was $5.25. As there father I could bump that up with no problem. Another employer would not have been so charitable. The current immediate increase in the minimum wage will not affect 99.99% of Americans. Even burger flipping jobs start at $6.50 these days. If the minimum jumps, the poorest will suffer first. The biggest proponents of the minimum wage over the past century have been labor unions which never have anyone make near the minimum. It helps to eliminate labor competition. This is a real consequence of the current election. Yes the repubs would eventually compromise on principle, but they would have lagged. A matter of degree.

Another real effect of the election is potential gun control. Unnecessary and inefficient government harassments will likely be passed. No ban, just unnecessary crap that only helps government control its subjects.

Healthcare will come to the forefront. Bush laid a nice red carpet to the Medicare drug entitlement. It is not abortion that will be legal, safe and rare. It will be all medical care. In degree there is a difference. I hope your family is reasonably healthy. That will be an excellent asset going into socialized medicine.

9:20 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

More like Who’ll Stop The Rain

4:05 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

MI,

As a unabashed Christian, I have to take some umbrage at your Oxymoron comment. Although I suspect you knew that would be my reaction.

It is tough expressing myself on this subject because inevitably it results in rather harsh criticism of many of my brothers and sisters in Christ. But on the subject of “tolerance” I feel compelled to speak out.

I am not saying anything that the readers here do not know when I remind you that Christ was the first and foremost preacher of tolerance. Tolerance in the sense of an understanding the human condition. Christ further commanded us to be tolerant of others. You know, “turn the other cheek” and all that jazz.

Unfortunately, Christianity in America has morphed into something different and often ugly. I have taken Dobson and others to task and I often find the sanctimony of the leaders and the people who follow them obnoxious.

As I have said at least a hundred times, how much more would the cause of Christ been advanced had the energy and resources put into fighting gay marriage instead been put into aids outreach and other worthy endeavors? It saddens me greatly that people have been so blinded by their own success that they forget the essentials of what Jesus taught.

And I certainly don’t hold myself up as any kind of model. My shame over my own failings is something I prefer to not discuss if that is OK. But I still shake myself and wonder if some people who call themselves my brother in Christ ever listen to their own words. Whether they consider how they might sound to others with any degree of serious introspection. Sadly, I do not think they do.

But do not be mistaken, not all Christians are like this. I sense the Christian community is starting to get some of it. I hear more humility of late than in the past. Less political stumping from the pulpit. Less confidence that all of the answers are in hand. I hope it isn’t just my imagination.

A final word on tolerance. While I do believe in tolerance of this kind, I do not appreciate those who demand tolerance of the new politically correct variety. I do not care much for those who say that I must totally accept the views of others as equal in validity or truth. I once told someone that was in need of great help that I would always be there to assist them but that they should not ask me to tell them that I thought what they were doing was fine. I will tolerate a great deal in the traditional sense, and very little in the latter.

Believe what you want. Think what you want. Do what you want within the limits of an ordered society. Ask me for a hand when you are down. Just don’t ask me to validate your choices: I don’t have that power.

5:10 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Intolerant Christians, isn't that an oxymoron?

Each belief system tries to convert others to their way of thinking. Not long ago psychologist though homosexuality was deviant, unhealthy behavior. It was against western social morals & customs. In polite society, and otherwise, it was not “tolerated”. If one were of that persuasion one would seek to be tolerated. Over the past 20 years they have come along way baby.

As groups have attained political clout certain buzzwords have become the new trump card. We’ve seen the word racist come into being in the 1960's and 1970's. Jackson and Sharpton are a little too quick with it at times.

An uproar of recent years is the word intolerance. In the original since of the word I am “tolerant” of others beliefs and forms of worship. However, an unwillingness to desire that children in public school to be taught the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered lifestyle as normal is labeled “intolerant”. This distorted definition of intolerance I claim. Rather than hypocritically reading that it is a sin and then turning around and permitting it to be given the same moral status as heterosexual monogamous marriage in my culture, I try to be consistent. As a fallen creature I am not perfect, but this makes sense to me. Other examples exist as well.

Ditto what Tony just wrote. I jess ain’t so L-E-Quint. All forms of sinful behavior seeks validation. You have less guilt when others agree with you. The fact that certain folks don’t rubber stamp their approval of what others do will always look like “intolerance.”

5:48 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Being a tiny sole proprietor I do not directly dialog with upper management who are brain washed in BizSpeak - that important sounding mumbo-jumbo psychobabble of the executives in management around the country. But I do talk to some of the people who have to put up with it. (Glad to be self employed and poor :) When I hear Pres. Bush speak, that psychobabble is what I hear. Important sounding vagaries with either no definition, an imprecise definition, or a changing definition. Sounds like someone caught doing something wrong, trying to BS their way out of the situation. An increasing number of people are doing this. Business, government, and even religions. Its an art to try and describe something in a indirect manner, avoiding the most useful and descriptive words. We don’t use the word “retarded” to describe retarded people. People don’t have handicaps, they have “differences.” People aren’t stupid, neurotic, traumatized, or eccentric - they have “issues.” I’m all for politeness and diplomacy, but this wave of political correctness disguised as such nearly makes me gag. I have a collection of psychobabble words. Which words set y’all off?

9:06 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

I don't know that any particular words out of context trouble me.

When the Attorney General called me a traitor, that bothered me. I hate "Presidents Day" because it so diminishes the importance of Washington and Lincoln. The word "feet" as a measurement bothers me because it reminds me how stupid we are.

I hate the word “debate” because it is used for made for television shows with no actual debate. I hate the word “gay” because it has been taken away and we don’t have another word in English that mean happy with exactly that tone and positive connotations.

I hate the word “millionaire” because it reminds me of my own wasted potential. And while I’m at it, I’m not fond of the word “failure” either. The term multicultural irritates me because it is always wrapped around an attempt to drive wedges between us rather than actually celebrate our differences.

The words “liberal” and “conservative” bother me because they used to mean something, but now they do not, and even if they both still did mean something, I’m not either even though stupid Americans insist that I must be one or the other. I hate the word “Indian” because I’m half Native American myself but I work with a bunch of people from India.

There is a start for you Prof.

10:05 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Some Democrats will get off the hook for Iraq because they will say the President lied to them. Or more likely, they will imply they were lied to and tell you that if they had all of the facts they never would have supported the war. This all part of the intricate plan of plausible deniability that all of these despicable lot build before they support anything with even a hint of controversy.

Obama seems like a good guy. What a shame he is a Democrat. Biden? Certainly and intelligent and articulate guy. But at the bottom of it all, he is just another partisan hack. A waste of quality DNA. I stand by my Hilary 2008 prediction.

9:46 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

” I predict that will not be true.”

Get a grip naiveté breath. The American people let Reagan off because he couldn’t remember. They let Clinton off because of politics. They gave Shrub a pass for years on WMDs even though it was obvious that lie stunk worse than a dead raccoon lying in the sun all election week.

The plausible deniability hand works nearly every time it is tried. Perhaps the war supporters are all in, but the American people never call. You, my friend, are the rare exception that will admit they are wrong. And politicians who admit they were wrong have a name: ex-politicians.

3:00 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

This is for all those people (you know who you are) who told me what an idiot I was when (back in 2001-02) I said that Iraq and North Korea were far more worrisome than Iraq.

4:48 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Yup. The Democrats are going to be a vast improvement.

Right.

7:21 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Folks, this is not going a good direction. The eschatological implications boggle the mind. In purely rational terms, I think we should all find this unsettling. We could all soon be wishing that our biggest worry were in fact $5/gallon gasoline.

9:37 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

I went to a tax seminar the past couple of days. While talking about the numerous energy credits, the speaker told us that Honda is currently producing a Fuel Cell vehicle. Its called the Honda FCX. The link describes most of the stats on the car. I’ll add they are building one (1) per month. The cost is $1.5 million per car. There are currently 25 stations in the US, the majority of which are in Calif. $5.60/gallon equivalent. You can lease one for $500/month. It is listed as a zero emission vehicle. The plant that produces the hydrogen cannot boast the same claim.

I suppose if we remove the pollution creation from the vehicle (that which we can see and identify) to the fuel generation plant for hydrogen and electric cars (that which we can not see), we can feel good feelings about ourselves and have government mandate a certain percentage of “zero pollution” vehicles from manufacturers.

A better law might be to permit lynching in Washington DC for Bureaucrats that govern by feelings....which coincidentally would eliminate about 95% of Democrats and about 30-60% of Republicans.

Sorry, I was speaking from my feelings.

1:33 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

What if they voted for it before they voted against it? :)

10:21 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Hillary is a special case in every sense of the phrase. Normal rules do not apply.

Is Spudder’s still in business? I’d love a steak from there.

So Democrats of Curmland, I pose the question: Why not Hillary? (Outside of the war vote.)

9:21 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

RandyP,

Welcome back our long lost friend!

T-town would be Tulsa. And I feel confident given your contributions around these parts that CG would be on board for buying you a steak too. If we meet up in T-town and CG cheaps out...you know how commies are...then I'll buy the steak.

1:27 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Oh, BTW, being 100th doesn't make it so, but I'd definitely call you "special".

1:27 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

MI: “Prof - Yeah, empathy and emotion. You hate to see it in a human being. Another imperfect trait(s) that must be stamped out in our time.

An astute jurist should know the difference between having empathy and emotion, and governing by your feelings. We have the Constitution and are governed by law. That makes the king and the peasant equal before the law. Much of the railings of the empathetic and emotional are precisely because of their since of injustice by either society or circumstance. Empathy and emotion also drove lynchings. I know of no one who did wrongs who first did not justify the act in their own mind. Everyone thinks they are right. Governing by the emotions of the moment would have had us nuking somebody after 9/11.

On a somber note Milton Freidman just passed away at age 94. :(

1:31 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof,

It is funny you posted that. I logged on to make mention of Friedman to you. He shaped a lot of my early thinking on things.

RandyP, I think I was being emotionally empathetic. Hope that helps. :-D

2:10 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

And how come I'm the only one with a stinking avatar?

Here are some suggestions for you:

CG

Prof

MI

2:31 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

No, I had noticed before. I just decided to get snobbish about it.

2:44 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

CG said, "I've become convinced McCain would do anything and say anything to get into the White House. Pretty sad really..."

Substitute Obama, Hillary, Daniel Ortega or any body else that might get the Democratic nomination, and you have a nice axiom there.

8:17 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

CG,
I'll be in your state tomorrow. Its a senior outing for our son's graduating class. We're going to Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Saturday. I'll wave to you as we come across the border on Hwy 44, and yes, I'll use all five fingers. :) Y'all have a great weekend.

11:06 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof, Prof, Prof my friend. If I didn't know you so well, I would not point this out. But a REAL friend is always there to help.

It isn't possible to visit the state of Confusion. It is just an expression.

Let me know if you are hearing voices or anything and I'll see what I can do.

8:43 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof, just remind CG who his party is nominating for President in 2008.

10:54 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G. “It sounds like your initial thinking was formed by one of Reagan's trickle down preachers. I hope you have shed yourself of such bs.

Milton Friedman explained the economic laws as born out by historical evidence. “Trickle down” is a political phrase of how to supposedly use economic laws to accomplish political or societal goals. Economic laws do not seek to accomplish goals. The just exist in the universe of rational man.

BTW, The wildlife refuge was gorgeous and I took many pictures. We saw deer, longhorns, bison, the gorge, the boulder Rock Rooms, from a distance the “apple and pear”, and even one of the rock arches. The weather was cool and pleasant. A perfect day.

5:02 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Saying that Milton Friedman was about "trickle down" economics is like saying that Stephen Hawking is all about black holes.

I hate to break it to you but the Monetarism school influenced economics in a very profound way. Whatever political use this thinking has been abused by just doesn't matter. Friedman's insights into the money supply were on target. Those that followed his lead...most significantly Jimmy Carter AND Ronald Reagan, saved us from economic ruin.

Blow off Friedman if you choose, but that is like ignoring Marx simply because you disagree. He was one of the significant intellectual contributors of the 20th Century and even those who disagreed with him on much would agree with that statement.

7:39 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G. “Obama said it, and now Rangel said it. If we had a draft, we would not be in Iraq today.

This is not logical. The draft confiscates labor at below market prices. If you have all the hammers you want, everything looks like a nail. If you have all the army you want, you would tend to use the military to accomplish your goals. The draft empowers the government with tremendous manpower and hides the cost of war.

Consequently, If we had a draft, we’d also be in Iran, Pakistan, N. Korea, Venezuela, & Oklahoma, etc. : )

Further reading.

Randy P.: “Every snot nosed little kid could use a little discipline in their life, my 17 yr old included.

So another governmental function is a post-childhood daycare service for the parenting skills challenged among us?

2:01 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Looks like my Hillary prediction just got a bit more probable.

7:49 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G.: “Let me get this straight... in a discussion about the morality of leaving the burden of war on the backs of a thin slice of our population, one jumps into a dicussion about the economics and capitalism of the military.

You got it wrong. You mentioned Obama and Rangel suggesting the Draft. You said Seriously, think about that. I just happened to mention just one view of the confiscation of labor for military purposes, which, right or wrong, is what it is. Let’s be big boys about this and call it what it is. Randy maybe right that we are justified in doing so. However, that does not negate the economic consequences of doing so.

The argument for getting out of the draft was that it disproportionately affected the poor. Now that is the argument for it. Our Founding Fathers did not want to have a standing army. They thought it was dangerous and that the country would start jacking with other countries and getting into wars. Well that would never happen right? :-)

The economics of any use of the public funds or private resources for public good is a legitimate discussion.

BTW, last night my son registered online for . He would like to join the military but would not be accepted because of his hand.

Tony,

A quick neat article on
Friedman.

12:11 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof,

That was a good little read on Friedman. An interesting take for sure.

I saw a rebroadcast of a Charlie Rose interview with MF. Even though he was getting on in years, the intellectual energy he exhibited was simply amazing. I can only imagine the wheels turning in that head.

It is rather sad that you haven’t heard Monetarism discussed much in the wake of his death. His legacy and impact on the Federal Reserve was forgotten before he even died. Ah well, I am sure that Rose is comforted more by the real impact her husband had than she ever would’ve been by the vacuous unknowing accolades of the political class.

2:25 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Its not simply about having the finest military possible per se. I focus more on the flip side. Professional soldiers can generally not trust draftees. There are a lot of exceptions for sure-draftees that took the duty seriously and were capable soldiers. But for the most part, draftees are less reliable soldiers. This has been true since the age of the Phalanx and will continue long after we are departed.

I have no trouble with the notion of shared sacrifice. I think that is important too. What I have a problem with is forcing professional military to accept even greater risk because of a bunch of politicians’ notions of social justice. Imagine being that professional soldier for a minute. Not only would we be asking them to risk their lives, but forcing them to suffer much higher risk for a political purpose. Talk about immoral.

Now I know that isn’t exactly what anyone here is suggesting, but I think that reality needs to be understood.

8:10 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Tony,

And a corollary is women in the military and the reduced thresholds for accomplishment so that women sent to assist in particular tasks can not even lift or do the work. By design, men are stronger and more capable for war. But Femmobabble seeks equality regardless of how ridiculous and dangerous the outcome. Such social equality is fine for discussion for the reality displaced among us, but has a poor record in the history books.

9:06 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Like George Bush, I like to make up words.

Feminist + Psychobabble = Nonsensical rambling of the lunatic feminist mind.
Or Femmobabble.

9:40 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof,

You know what irritates me on the social justice front? The canine species gets off nearly scott free on shouldering their share of the burden! Oh sure, there are a few volunteers-we’ve seen the cute pictures with the company mascot. But it is time they pulled their load!

Dogs enjoy all of the privileges of living here in the United States. A quarter of the world’s population would do well to eat as well as the average dog does in the United States. It is time they share the burdens with mankind. It is time for Rover to hit the trenches and start living up to the moniker “Man’s Best Friend”.

Anything less than a Doggie Draft is simply unfair and immoral.

Once my insightful plan is implemented, I have dibs on the GI-Spot doll royalties.

10:06 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Tony: “The canine species gets off nearly scott free on shouldering their share of the burden!

Don’t overlook the social injustice of arrogant cats getting off Scott free. I think a pride of Persians armored in C-4 behind enemy lines would kill two birds with one stone, sort of.

If you’ve got time, or want to make time, I stumbled over some free download videos about creation and old earth vs new earth vs evolution. The download page is here. Big downloads, long presentation, and extremely interesting “facts.” I particular liked the fourth one Lies in the Textbooks.

C.G.,
I do not doubt Mrs. Curm is capable. However, I met my wife in a Karate class 27 years ago. She out ranks me by two belts now. Don’t know what it is about microbiologist and tail whippin, but I wouldn’t mess with ‘em myself.

Randy P., et al,
Have a happy Thanksgiving Day! Don’t forget to whom you are thankful and fer what you are thankful.

Adios!

2:25 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

I do not agree that the draft would further empower the government to wage war. If that were true, this administration would have done it a long time ago.

It is true that this administration jumped on the war bandwagon quickly for Afghanistan and Iraq. But do you not think if they had the draft, then more bodies would be present, and if they had more bodies present, more bodies would be present in So.Korea in response to N.Korea, a military response to Iran’s nuclear push, and in Taiwan in response to China’s reaction to the Taiwan move toward independence? I believe the current “tight” supply of military resources (particularly manpower) has hampered the U.S. war machine.

The Draft is a political issue as well as a strategic issue.

8:45 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

2005 saw 28 Hurricanes. 2006 saw 9 named storms, the quietist season in a decade. More than half of the record 28 were supposedly the result of global warming heating the Atlantic. Question: Has the earth rapidly cooled in the last year, or are factors other than global warming at work here, AND THEREFORE, claiming the 2005 record number of storms as EVIDENCE of global warming is a tad premature for the “scientific” community?

9:13 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G.: “Prof... the science on global warming is in.

Science used to be observation. Now it plays the tune of educational elites and special interest groups. It used to be that the “science” of psychology found homosexuality, transsexuals, and pedofiles to be deviants and psychologically screwed up. Now it’s a “choice”. Did the science change? Was it wrong before, or wrong now? Evolution is considered science. However, we have only observe variation, not new species creation. We cannot observe what happened in the past, we can only interpret it, and that usually happens through the lense of our worldview. The “evolution” of the scientific age of the earth is fun to watch. The actual age of the earth is only progressing about one year/year, but the “science” of it is progressing about 2 million years per year. The science of global warming comes on the heals of the . Please take the time to read the portion of this summary located here that deals with global warming. “Environmentalists have a knack for couching their lies in just enough truth so that the uninformed (who are the majority) are convinced.

I'm not sure what your (or Sen. Inhoffe's) vested interest is in the Inconvientent Truth being a hoax, but I will go with science on this one.

The question is, Who’s science? :-)

Perhaps you might explore carbon dioxide expressed in parts per million... or how many of the hottest 10 days on record have occured in the last 15 years.

See summary above.

Give it up... you are just looking goofy. :)

No, I look goofy for other reasons. Abandon the “uninformed” majority (Lemmings?) and reject the Environmentalists trump card of clapping their hands and squealing “science” when they don’t have anything to go on. It kind of looks goofy.

And finally some advice. Don’t invest so much in a failed interpretation of data driven by earth worshipers and enviromentalist whachos that you have to go down with the ship. Save face early and seek truth. The ozone-is-falling chickens won’t look good in another decade or two, and the indigent across the globe will be hurt economically because anti-ozone-is-falling treaties will make basic necessities cost more.

2:59 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

HTML glitch above. Right before link "science of global cooling." which should have been the link. The link is in two parts. The word "here" was the second link. Could have swore I did it correctly. Sry.

5:19 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

"Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa. If those numbers are correct, it translates to 4,380 Americans murdered annually by illegal aliens. That's 21,900 since Sept. 11, 2001.

"Total U.S. troop deaths in Iraq as of last week were reported at 2,863. Total U.S. troop deaths in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan during the five years of the Afghan campaign are currently at 289, according to the Department of Defense.
" Article here.

It doesn't stop there. The article says another 13 Americans are killed each day from drunk illegal agliens. A number of other "benefits" of an open border are listed in the article.

Folks, they’re a different culture. Political correctness is fine for those who can't think, but I really don't think you want this country adopting the immoral thugs streaming across the border as part of the “melting pot.” If you mix a clean shirt and dirt, the dirt don’t get no cleaner. However, the shirt does get dirtier. Similarly, If folks stream here already breaking our immigration, forgery, and tax laws, does it seem sane to believe they will cower in shame at the thought of drinking and driving, shop lifting, driving without a license, or insurance, or respecting employment laws, trespassing on private property? The Columbine High School murders Clebold and what’s his doodle broke 18 gun laws before they murdered. The Libs wanted more gun laws after that tragedy. Duh? If you are already breaking laws, breaking more is just a matter of degree.

If you had lost a loved one to an illegal alien, how would you feel about Bush’s open border? Well, leftist Bush got his Democrat majority to push his open border on us. Now they can commit their crimes, but we loose the option to send them “home” because we have forgiven their international trespassing, forgery, and tax evasion antics. The illegals, not the politicians. Just thought I’d clarify.

10:18 AM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Randy,

Why do you disagree completely with amnesty? I am not going to try and argue with you. I've made my feelings clear enough. But I'd like to hear why you feel strongly about it.

4:13 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Randy,

One hour ago I talked to my brother, a truck driver for a very large retailer, and he said last night one of their drivers had the exact same occurrence. Illegal caused the accident, little or no ID, police officer lets them go. I guess international trespassing, serial traffic law breaking, failure to pilot a vehicle in a safe manner are not worth investigating. I’m sorry you are a victim of stupid border policy. Like other minorities, Illegal’s are a protected group. If that was you are me, we’d have spent the night in the slammer for reckless endangerment or some such charge. Must be nice to get a free pass to drive like an idiot.

Can you imagine what the Mexican governments response would be if we drove in a reckless manner with nary an ID on us and a history of offenses? Granted driving reckless in Mexico would take quite the imagination and will power, but I hear it can be done.

P.R.

10:52 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G.: “Driving on our highways will always be a collective risk...

Usually minimized by rules and laws. Drive on the right side, read the signs, proper following distance, etc. Laws governing vehicles, passive restraints, emissions, etc. Laws on vehicle manufactures and drivers. Minimizing risk is good. Saves money, saves lives.

...you just can't boil it down to simple personal-responsibility-doctrine.

You absolutely can and should. Man is an absolutely agreeable creature to be around when he cares about the outcome of his actions. I realize they are poor, but it is an insult to the poor to think that irresponsibility and criminal behavior is a characteristic of the poor. Irresponsibility and criminal behavior is a characteristic of socialist hell holes that produce vast quantities of poor through safety nets and other forms of taking over a persons responsibility and creating “collective risk.” It is painful that this is a mystery to you. :)

We are going to have poor people driving-for-food...

You mean driving illegally for food. Well, they trespass for food. They forge documents for food. They evade taxes for food. They march with the Mexican flag for food. And the refuse to learn the language for food. How about we ship the food to Mexico and cut down on all the illegal crap going on in our country? A little international welfare. Of course we can’t discriminate. Let’s ship it to the other 228 countries as well.

I don't have time to spell out a government safety-net here beyond private insurance... but let's just say in my liberal world the uninsured motorist thing would be federally covered in one way or another.

Wow. If I could get the Fed to pick up payments for my reckless freeway activity, that would remove higher insurance premium incentive from driving poorly.

Randy,

I believe in the concept of restitution. It has incredible benefits. The victim gets just compensation for damage done and the perpetrator gets the knowledge that he has righted his wrong, with INCENTIVE to do things correctly in the future. The illegal should have been taken into custody. The local police have been schooled not only in traffic laws, but family violence, hostage negotiations, teddy bears for kiddos, drug identification, etc. Add another two day seminar on how to do INS’s job. ID these bad boys - fingerprints, papers, photo ID, DNA etc. His freedom will involve identifying his employer. Fine the employer and use proceeds for the victim restitution. OR Allow him to continue working and scarf 1/3 of his pay, garnished from the employer(s), to be used for restitution. OR put him to work in prison. Real work. Garnish 80% for restitution. After taxes that should be about right. OR you can reward him for reckless behavior by taxing citizens as “insurance” to pay for his foolish criminal behavior.

P.R.

5:15 PM  
Blogger Tony Plank said...

Prof and Randy,

Do neither of you see any complicity on the part of the US government in the illegal status of the illegal aliens? I mean, they are just seldom enforced laws and we practically leave out a welcome mat.

How can we come down so hard on the illegal aliens when we have been so hypocrytical?

5:57 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G.: “What happens to a family when all of it's savings is wiped out due to huge medical bills?

The same thing that happens to a family that has an uninsured house burn down, or a business that goes bankrupt, or a lawsuit that wipes them out. Heck, most folks don’t have any savings, but have high credit card balances, upside down financed autos, and a really nice plasma HDTV. Our old church had a boy that needed a liver transplant. Many hundreds of thousands of dollars. We had fund raisers. You do what you can.

Is it possible the kids of that family (perhaps more than one generation) gets economically stunted?

No body starts at the same point, nobody progress at the same rate, and no body ends at the same place. And guess what? That’s OK. What I have or don’t have has no bearing on you. As far as I can tell, most young adults start off with nearly nothing. You don’t get issued a fully furnished home when you get married or graduate from high school or college. Are those folks “poor”? Do they have a healthy savings? Of course not. The LEGAL immigrants that arrived here these past 400 years mostly had their savings “wiped out” by just the transportation to get here. Do you think they whined about their kids being “economically stunted?” No, they opened up a shop without a college degree, without a medical safety net and thought they were in heaven. Without a cent to their name they had more hope because of the opportunity in the private sector in the freedoms to work hard and reap the benefits of their ingenuity.

Is it possible collectively covering these families when the rare (really not that rare) tradegy occurs makes economic sense... that family and it's future posterity ecomomic earning post-society-safety-net more than makes up for the investment.

You view the fixed pie. You see it if some have, then others must not have. If someone is poor, unless money is given to them they cannot change. Other that contradicting several hundred million examples to the contrary in this country, you’re probably right. :-) I wonder, do you have anything of value? Who gave it to you? If you purchased with wealth you earned, are you so elitist that you think everybody else is too stupid to duplicate your efforts? If a family looses everything in a tragedy, including job, do you consider them poor? I consider them as starting back at the starting line like when they first started out on their own.

I know it is usual for bleeding hearts to get all lathered up over the poor, but I think you’ve manufactured in your mind some level of wealth that one must have to be happy, and have over burdened yourself with excess lather. :-D
P.R.

10:17 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Tony,
Do neither of you see any complicity on the part of the US government in the illegal status of the illegal aliens?

Sure. It started with making laws. Then we made it worse by not enforcing them.

How can we come down so hard on the illegal aliens when we have been so hypocrytical?

By coming down hard, we will cease to be hypocritical. The hypocrisy is having laws and NOT enforcing them. The problem is not in having laws, but the slack enforcement. I do not fault the Illegals for being smart enough to take advantage of slack enforcement. Its like children having parents who say: “Don’t do that Johnny. I said don’t do it. I’ll count to three. Johnny aren’t you listening to me? One. Listen to me, I said one.” This is a parent who is afraid to give a consequence to disobedience. Once the parent gets a spine and monitors and disciplines, the child will experience the pain of the consequence of disobedience PLUS the frustration of the inconsistent enforcement. The answer is not to continue being a bad parent, but to start doing things right. Similarly in immigration, the whole situation is remedied by consistently enforcing the laws. I am not asking for new laws, or some hatred of Hispanics. Just enforce the laws like we did before we became politically correct and ignored law breaking to achieve some social engineering goal.

P.R.

10:20 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

7:21 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Where is Yoshi when you need him.

Africa Faces Growing Obesity Problem

“More than one-third of African women and a quarter of African men are estimated to be overweight, and the World Health Organization predicts that will rise to 41 percent and 30 percent respectively in the next 10 years.”

I suppose part of that 1% of GNP we’ve obligated to world welfare should go into health clubs like Curves ?

7:23 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G.,

Interesting. You’ve built a self supporting system. Currently the “middle class”, whatever that is, is growing quickly (less foolish consumerism debt issues), the exit out of this “middle class” tends to be people graduating into the wealthy millionaire class that is growing rapidly. You seem to be for people getting better, but not too much better since you rail against “wealth gaps.” You are for unlimited immigration so that the stream of have nots will look disproportionate to the graduating middle class thus creating further “wealth gap”, and therefore the necessity of more of the same policies. Yes, you are for unlimited immigration. When you say in #4 that 11 million trespassing, forging, tax evading law breakers will receive amnesty because laws dealing with “the illegal working to feed your family is hardly a law at all.” Then you have no moral basis to prevent future seekers of “working to feed your family” from entering. That inconsistent treatment would hardly be fair to those who waited patiently. Additionally, because laws and words have meaning, you start setting a legal precedent of not prosecuting “trespassing, forging, and tax evading.” Were I involved in one of those crimes I would seek dismissal of the charge based upon what you would have as current practices and immigration policy.

About giving advice of me giving advice at the Boston Tea Party. Under their thinking, since Christ was the real King, this other English king could not usurp the people’s right “endowed by their Creator.” In their minds they were not breaking a law. They were upholding Biblical law by taking action against a usurper. Any action that quells excessive government in a reasonable manner gets a thumbs up for me.

And as far as “creating the middle class.” That happened when government was restrained by the Constitution. As our Constitution was converted from law to a wishy-washy living document, using Marx’s terminology class, or wealth gaps, have emerged. The greatest wealth gaps are in countries with oppressive governments. Only the haves benefit. In free countries all peoples can benefit. Believe it or not, there are wealthy people in Mexico. But with that socialist hell hole of safety nets, the common citizens are fleeing. By population nearly 10% of Mexican citizens are in the U.S. Doesn’t say much for the philosophy of government controlling the economic system does it?

P.R.

P.S. My bro was driving through your state yesterday. He said the snow was blowing like crazy.

10:49 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

“Congress will approve an immigration bill that will grant citizenship rights to most of the 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens in the U.S. after Democrats take control next month, predict both sides on Capitol Hill.” The Washington Times

Why don’t we grant citizenship rights to all 6 billion people? Who are we to restrict the blessings and riches of such a great nation?

Political correctness is devastating this country as is evidenced by the 6 probing Imams.

8:57 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G.,

Why do you think Sodomites want to get “married”? What benefits accrue for them if they do?

8:58 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

What are the consequences of allowing illegal aliens the right to vote (a right restricted to citizens)? You don't think they would favor representatives that favored their homeland over American interests do you? What could be wrong with that?

9:01 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Common,
Did you feel the earthquake today?

3:20 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Common,
I bet all of those Shiavo force feeding and force breathing zealots are now ready to pull the plug on our 1 vote margin South Dakota senator. :)

On the contrary, I hope he recovers quickly. However, if he lingers in asparagus and broccoli land, he may need to be pulled from the drivers seat of his position. Not only are the Republicans salivating at the consequences of a Republican majority and all the Senate committees whose leadership depend on that, but the Democrats (...or food and oxygen withholding zealots :) have incentive to keep an invalid in a position unable to perform their duty, for the exact same reasons. Whatever is decided, it should be done regardless of party consequences and along some nobler rule of law type method, rather than the political “depends on who’s ox is getting gored.” Ok Tony, I’ll put down the crack pipe.

5:20 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...


10 most underreported stories of 2006

7:55 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Guardsmen overrun at the Border
12 News
Jan. 4, 2007 02:44 PM
National Guard unit stormed while patroling the border, Border attack raises security concerns

A U.S. Border Patrol entry Identification Team site was overrun Wednesday night along Arizona's border with Mexico.

According to the Border Patrol, an unknown number of gunmen attacked the site in the state's West Desert Region around 11 p.m. The site is manned by National Guardsmen. Those guardsmen were forced to retreat

Link to story

Just remember, they are only here to feed their families and do jobs you wont do.

5:43 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Another good commentary (for C.G.):

Dems' 'income inequality' silliness

12:35 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

“The Weather Channel” Mess
January 18, 2007, 5:45 pm | James Spann

Well, well. Some “climate expert” on “The Weather Channel” wants to take away AMS certification from those of us who believe the recent “global warming” is a natural process. So much for “tolerance”, huh?

I have been in operational meteorology since 1978, and I know dozens and dozens of broadcast meteorologists all over the country. Our big job: look at a large volume of raw data and come up with a public weather forecast for the next seven days. I do not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys into the man-made global warming hype. I know there must be a few out there, but I can’t find them. Here are the basic facts you need to know:

*Billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Always follow the money trail and it tells a story. Even the lady at “The Weather Channel” probably gets paid good money for a prime time show on climate change. No man-made global warming, no show, and no salary. Nothing wrong with making money at all, but when money becomes the motivation for a scientific conclusion, then we have a problem. For many, global warming is a big cash grab...
Link

1:17 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

There goes the internet and my GoreTex boots. :-)

3:53 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

C.G.,

He is deep in the middle of the 30 year conservative movement dedicated to getting rid of anything new deal.

Or anything conservative. He’s a Democrat C.G. He has abandoned his base. He welcomed the Democrat controlled congress. One might say he even longed for it.

Well... Bush hasn't been part of that 30 year effort for the entire time... there were the cocaine years.

Was he hanging out with Barack Hussain Obama? He’s admitted using coke himself. Maybe the druggies will oust the druggies.

Speaking of new blood, How about that Pelosi? Wants her own taxpayer paid for Jets, tuna-gate, and all. Quite the jewel of character the Democrats elected as the best they have to offer as House Majority Leader. Out with the old corruption, in with the new....

And you wonder why I loath to give our healthcare system over to the government?

I like visuals. They can lie, but they can also better explain one item relative to another. Take a look at this older video entitled Immigration by the Numbers ( here ).

Prof. Ricardo

4:07 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

TED TURNER: Global Warming is 'single greatest challenge that humanity has ever faced'...

BWAHAHHAHAHHAA!!!

Governor Plans To Fire Oregon Climatologist for Skeptical View of Warming...

Yup! It's not politics, It's science. Why else would a politician want to fire a scientist for his scientific conclusions? You gotta spew the party line or you're out of here.

Below-Zero Temps Close Schools...

Iceland Bucks Global Warming Trend - Increasing Ice...

Harsh Cold Expected to Linger in Midwest

9:48 PM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Obama gets a silly question.

Finally, a politician whose word we can depend on.

7:24 AM  
Blogger Richard Hartman said...

Dupety-duptey-do. Hey everybody, posting has ceased. Yup, life goes on. It’s been a mixed Spring in Ricardo’s household.

I found a video worth watching. It’s called The Great Global Warming Swindle (2007). It was banned from the politically correct Google (that always celebrates secular holidays with its logo over the search box) video where it had moved up to the 16th position of their top 100 videos when I discovered it. It would be food for thought for both Yoshitownsend and Common Good, as it not only covers the Global Warming political aspect as well as the political movement’s effect on the poor.

11:28 PM  
Blogger Usman Awais said...

Delivery driver with bike
Delivery bikes with rider,
Food delivery services in UAE
Delivery bike

6:14 AM  
Blogger xbdesings said...

watch winders in USA
Wrist Watch for Men
Best Watch brands in USA
Watch Brands in USA
Wrist Watch for kids
wrist watch for girls

9:33 AM  
Blogger Drift Financial Services said...

Good luck & keep writing such awesome content.

Virgin Linseed Oil BP
flaxseed oil

1:05 AM  
Blogger Drift Financial Services said...

Best content & valuable as well. Thanks for sharing this content.
Approved Auditor in DAFZA
Approved Auditor in RAKEZ
Approved Auditor in JAFZA
i heard about this blog & get actually whatever i was finding. Nice post love to read this blog
Approved Auditor in DMCC

1:05 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home